China Trademark Declaration of Invalidity: Practical Guide for Cross-Border Brand Protection

⏱️ Reading time: 3~7 minutes 📅 Updated: January 12, 2026 ✍️ Author: CTMAA Expert Team
By: CTMAA Expert Team
CNIPA-registered trademark professionals and cross-border IP specialists with extensive experience advising US and EU companies.
Reviewed: Jenna Wang Trademark Enforcement & Opposition Specialist – CNIPA-Registered Trademark Agent 10+ years in China trademark strategy for foreign brands/span>

As China’s market continues to attract international brands, trademark protection has become a core factor for market entry and sustainable development. In practice, malicious trademark squatting by foreign competitors or delayed domestic registrations are common challenges. Trademark invalidation (Declaration of Invalidity, CNIPA) has become an essential legal tool for overseas companies to safeguard their brand rights.

⚖️

Guide Purpose

This guide provides systematic and actionable practical references for both foreign brands and Chinese domestic enterprises navigating trademark invalidation procedures in China. Depending on the situation, you can also protect your trademark rights through Opposition, Non-use Cancellation, and Litigation.

1 Overview of Trademark Invalidation and Legal Basis

1.1 Definition of Trademark Invalidation

Trademark invalidation is an administrative procedure where any individual or entity may request the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) to declare a registered trademark invalid from the outset if it has legal defects or violates prohibited registration provisions.

Key Difference from Opposition:

⚖️
Opposition: Targets trademarks before registration during the publication period. Learn more about china trademark Opposition
📋
Invalidation: Applies to already registered trademarks and has retroactive effect

1.2 Legal Basis and Applicable Paths

According to the Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China, trademark invalidation mainly follows two paths:

2 Invalidation Procedures and Timeline

2.1 Standard Procedure

1

Application Submission

Submit the invalidation request and supporting evidence via the CNIPA website.

2

Formal Examination

Review completeness of forms and supporting documents.

3

Substantive Examination

CNIPA examines the grounds and evidence; may request supplementary documents.

4

Opposition or Defense

The respondent may submit a defense or counter-evidence.

5

Decision Issuance

CNIPA issues the invalidation decision.

6

Administrative Litigation (Optional)

Either party may file for judicial review if dissatisfied with the CNIPA decision.

China Declaration of Invalidity Procedure Flowchart

Note: This flowchart illustrates the complete trademark invalidation process in China, from initial application to potential judicial review.

2.2 Fees and Timeline

Item CNIPA Fee Reference Agency Fee Timeline
Per-class invalidation RMB 675–750 Complex cross-border cases: RMB 20,000–100,000 12–18 months, may extend
Defensive registration RMB 270–300/class USD 300-800/class 6–9 months
ℹ️

Note: Timelines may extend by 1–2 years depending on case complexity, evidence volume, and whether litigation occurs.

3 Evidence Strategy and Offensive/Defensive Logic

3.1 Offensive Strategy (Proactive Enforcement)

⚔️

Objective: Remove obstacles and secure full trademark rights in China.

Core Strategies:
  • Legal Path Selection: Prioritize Article 44 (“Registration obtained by improper means”) as it has no five-year limit.
  • Focus on Malicious Registration by Cross-Border Competitors: Emphasize “systematic malicious registration” evidence.
Key Evidence:
Evidence Type Example Purpose
Prior Use Production/export contracts, customs declarations, product photos with marks Prove trademark was commercially used in China
Brand Influence Overseas sales, international trade shows, awards, media coverage Establish international recognition and industry influence in China
Malicious Registration Competitor’s trademark portfolio, affiliated companies, historical squatting patterns, offer-to-sell emails Demonstrate competitor’s bad faith
Likelihood of Confusion Industry association reports, inquiries/misidentification by customers Prove coexistence may cause confusion in the market
Practical Recommendations:
🔍
Investigate Competitor: Analyze all trademarks of the squatter to detect cross-class registrations and similarity to well-known brands.
🔗
Evidence Chain Closure: Contract → Production order → Product photos → Customs declaration → Overseas sales invoice.
🛡️
Simultaneous Defensive Registration: File defensive trademarks in key classes while preparing invalidation evidence.

3.2 Defensive Strategy (Responding to Invalidation)

🛡️

Objective: Maintain validity of registered trademarks and commercial arrangements.

Core Strategies:
  • Strengthen Rights: Provide continuous and genuine use evidence (contracts, invoices, advertising, product photos).
  • Good Faith Creation: Demonstrate independent creation and legitimate intent.
  • Procedural & Substantive Defense: Verify applicant eligibility, time limits, and challenge evidence credibility.
  • Counter Malicious Claims: Show actual use and that the trademark is not connected to others’ brands.

4 Cross-Border Practical Case References

Case Type Overview Core Actions
Case A Overseas medical device brand phonetic name registered by domestic competitor Collect evidence via website snapshots, trade show marketing, similar trademark lists; declare invalid based on improper means
Case B Dutch brand registered under Madrid Protocol with wrong class, allowing same-country competitor to squat Use production/export evidence and competitor’s same-country connection to prove malicious registration
Case C Domestic company facing invalidation claim Submit genuine use evidence, refute insufficient influence or bad faith claims, ultimately maintain trademark validity

Based on our practical experience, in recent years, the CNIPA has placed significant weight on the applicant’s/registrant’s pattern of filing/registration behavior in combating malicious registrations. This has become a key basis for examiners to determine whether it constitutes “bad-faith registration without intent to use.”

5 Overseas Brand Strategies and Recommendations

🛡️

Prevention First

  • Register trademarks in China covering core product classes and related services.
  • Plan Madrid Protocol class designation carefully before registration.
👀

Trademark Monitoring

  • Monitor initial publication periods to detect potential squatting early.
📁

Evidence System Construction

  • Systematically retain domestic and overseas use evidence.
  • Regularly organize supply chain, trade show, and media data to form evidence files.
🤝

Professional Local Agency Collaboration

  • Engage experienced Chinese local agents with administrative litigation and invalidation experience.
  • Work with attorneys to ensure evidence compliance, notarization, and translation accuracy.

6 Actionable Evidence Collection Templates

6.1 Offensive Evidence Collection

Category Specific Evidence Source/Method Legal Purpose Status/Notes
Prior Use Purchase contracts, design drawings, production orders, QC reports Chinese factories Prove commercial use in China To Collect / Collected
Logistics & Export Customs declarations, shipping orders, warehouse photos, product photos with marks Export records, 3PL Prove public and legal use To Collect / Collected
Overseas Sales Sales contracts, invoices, platform records, annual sales Overseas branches, platforms Prove international brand recognition To Collect / Collected
Promotion & Media Trade show contracts, booth photos, website/social media screenshots, ad contracts Internal company data, trade show organizers Demonstrate brand influence and recognition To Collect / Collected
Awards & Third-Party Reports Industry awards, media coverage, market research reports Industry associations, third-party agencies Support brand reputation and influence To Collect / Collected
Malicious Registration Competitor’s trademark list, affiliates, offer-to-sell emails CNIPA database, commercial investigation Prove systematic malicious registration To Collect / Collected
Confusion Risk Customer/supplier inquiries, misidentification records Sales/CS internal records Prove actual market confusion risk To Collect / Collected

6.2 Defensive Evidence Collection

Category Specific Evidence Source/Method Legal Purpose Status/Notes
Use Evidence Sales contracts, invoices, ads, product photos Internal company Prove actual trademark use To Collect / Collected
Good Faith Creation Trademark design drafts, application files Internal design team Demonstrate independent creation and no bad faith To Collect / Collected
Procedural & Substantive Defense Registration process documents, defense records CNIPA, agency Counter applicant claims To Collect / Collected
Brand Recognition & Influence Market research, media coverage, industry awards Third-party reports Refute claims of insufficient recognition To Collect / Collected

7 Call to Action (CTA)

🚀

Protect Your Brand Rights in China Now

To maximize protection of your brand in China, it is recommended to:

1

Initiate Investigation and Evidence Collection

Engage professional agents to analyze the squatter’s trademark portfolio and affiliations; systematically collect production, export, sales, and promotion evidence.

2

Simultaneous Defensive Registration

File defensive trademark applications in key classes immediately to prevent further losses.

3

Strategic Planning and Lawyer Collaboration

Work with local counsel to form a coherent invalidation strategy; dynamically supplement evidence to ensure maximum success.

📞

Contact us now to receive a customized Invalidation Action Plan, helping you quickly build an evidence chain and initiate legal action.

8 FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Q1: Can an overseas brand file an invalidation without selling in China?

A: Yes. Chinese law recognizes “commercial use” beyond sales, including production, processing, export, and public display. Legitimate, continuous, and public activities are sufficient as prior use evidence.

Q2: How long does invalidation take?

A: Standard administrative decisions take 12–18 months; complex cross-border cases or defenses may extend to 24 months. Judicial review may add 1–2 years.

Q3: Are overseas evidence materials valid?

A: Yes, if notarized and translated into Chinese, with original documents and authentication certificates preserved.

Q4: Does having a same-country competitor make malice easier to prove?

A: Yes. CNIPA and courts consider regional and industry relationships; competitors from the same country are presumed aware of well-known brands, aiding proof of malicious intent.

Q5: What is the difference between invalidation and opposition?

A: Opposition targets pre-registration publication; invalidation applies to already registered trademarks and has retroactive effect. Invalidation is more suitable for cross-border malicious squatting cases.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *